News Type: Media Mentions

Dana Kravetz was a guest on the Know the Risk podcast, sitting down with host Jay Gates to discuss service charges in the restaurant and hospitality spaces and the potential pitfalls of implementing these fees.

Dana Kravetz has been quoted in an article published by CNBC titled, “A fight between fast-food chains and unions in California is over, for now – what to know.” The piece covers a deal that sets a wage floor of $20 per hour for California workers at fast-food chains with at least 60 locations nationwide, starting April 1, and going up from there. Dana commented on the agreement’s impact on joint-employer liability and the existing franchise mode.

Dana Kravetz was called upon by HOTELS Magazine to comment on the NLRB’s expansion of the joint employer rule and its impact upon the hospitality space. In an article titled, “New Joint Employer Rule Makes Companies, Franchisors More Liable For Employees,” Dana urges hoteliers to tread lightly when it comes to oversight of third-party workers. He also provides insight into what hotel owners and franchisors should keep top of mind going forward in order to avoid joint employer liability.

Mark Robinson was a recent guest on Insurance Banter with Burand & Borup, podcasting about  Managing General Agents, what they are and what insurance professionals should keep top of mind when considering starting or doing business as an MGA.

Mona Hanna, Tim Gorry and M&R’s Trial Advocacy Program (TAP) were the focus of an extraordinary article published by AmLaw’s Litigation Daily, titled “Why This Midsize Firm Decided to Take Trial Training In House.” Congratulations to Mona and Tim on this year’s TAP mock trial, which was a huge success. Kudos as well to everyone in the firm who has participated in TAP and has worked to make it such a distinguishing feature that helps M&R stand in a class of its own when compared to other notable law firms nationwide.

In a podcast interview with Hotel News Now, Dana Kravetz provides commentary on Acheson Hotels v. Laufer, a case recently argued before the U.S. Supreme Court that centers around a plaintiff who sued a hotel company over not providing the required description on its website of the accessibility features at one of its hotels. The question at issue is whether the plaintiff had standing to sue the hotel if she did not intend to actually stay there and, instead, was simply acting as a “tester.”

Dana Kravetz has been quoted in a Law360 article titled, “Newest Senator Brings Mixed Wage-Hour Record To Role.” The piece covers the appointment of Laphonza Butler to the U.S. Senate to fill Dianne Feinstein’s seat and the apparent split in her record on employment issues—she worked to raise California’s minimum wage, yet has also served as an adviser to gig companies regarding wage and hour issues at the federal level.

Jeffrey Farrow has been quoted at length in an article published this week by IAM titled, “Apple’s ‘aggressive’ trade secrets enforcement in Rivos case fuels noncompete clause debate.” The case at the center of the story revolves around Apple’s allegation that former employees retained a significant amount of trade secret information when moving to another employer (Rivos). In his comments, Jeff shines a light on Rivos’s claim that the litigation is less about trade secrets and more about restricting the ability of employees to leave Apple in favor of different professional pursuits.

AI is front and center in an article published by Law.com titled, ‘”Cautious but Optimistic’: After Slow Adoption, Midsize Firms See Vast Potential for Gen AI.” Dana Kravetz was one of four law firm leaders extensively quoted in the piece. He commented on M&R’s plan on leveraging a customized AI platform for internal purposes in the near future and the technology being a core component of the firm’s new three-year strategic plan.

Law360 has published a comprehensive Q&A with Kelly Hagemann regarding the landscape of the addiction recovery industry and the U.S. Supreme Court’s pending decision whether to weigh in on Costa Mesa’s discrimination suits over its sober living home laws. In the piece, titled “Sober Living Homes Await Potential High Court Intervention,” Kelly emphasizes the need for behavioral health care to be treated the same as medical care, all in an effort to fight the continued stigma against mental health and substance use disorders.