Marc R. Jacobs

Partner
Los Angeles
+1 310-299-5500
mjacobs@mrllp.com
Share

Marc R. Jacobs

Partner
“I lead complex cases with a singular focus—protecting the enterprise. That means managing teams, setting strategy, and seeing around corners to anticipate challenges before they surface.”

Marc Jacobs brings nearly 30 years of litigation experience to bear in disputes that carry real business, financial, and reputational consequences. Known for his strategic thinking and courtroom instincts, he represents clients in litigation where the exposure is measured not just in dollars, but in brand and operational risk.

His practice spans financial services, insurance, employment, real estate, and regulatory matters. Marc represents banks, insurers, marketing companies, and property developers in cases involving trade secrets, unfair competition, consumer privacy, and class actions. From deceptive advertising claims to Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) suits, he is known for litigation strategies that protect the bottom line.

Marc also advises marketing and technology companies on compliance and risk tied to digital campaigns, user data, and fast-moving regulatory standards. His clients count on him not just to defend lawsuits, but to anticipate and avoid them when possible.

Beyond the courtroom, Marc has supported elite gymnastics organizations in the U.S. and U.K., advising on matters of privacy, governance, and risk. A creative at heart, he is also a published novelist and legal cartoonist whose work has appeared in publications nationwide.

View More

Representative Matters

  • Breach of Contract, Bad Faith: Successfully defended insurance carrier sued for allegedly failing to cover damages in a construction defect lawsuit. After a three-week trial, the insurer was found not to be liable for breach of contract or bad faith, which claims created potential exposure over $17M. The trial court's ruling was later affirmed by the California Court of Appeals
  • Brokerage Trade Secrets Litigation: Obtained a favorable outcome for an insurance broker who owned his brokerage for 25 years and sued a former employee that left the company and took the broker's customers. Litigated through a five-week trial, proving misappropriation and conversion of client lists and trade secrets.
  • Counseling: Assisted numerous gymnastics, sports, and athletic clubs and organizations, from youth sports through college, with business and entity formation; permits; privacy, social media, and intellectual property rights; labor and employment issues; and business litigation and contract matters.
  • Easement/Adverse Possession: Filed a successful motion for summary judgment on behalf of client in connection with a complex real property and easement dispute in Bel Air, California. The successful outcome forced an encroaching land owner to remove a portion of his property that had been in place for 45 years. The favorable judgment was subsequently affirmed by the California Court of Appeals.
  • Employment, Trade Secrets, and Business Litigation: When the former regional president of a national insurance brokerage left the company, he took with him trade secrets, client lists and customers. Upon his departure, the ex-employee was allegedly entitled to a multi-million dollar buyout of his company shares. Filed a lawsuit against the former president on behalf of the brokerage for breach of contract and theft of trade secrets, asserting claims the value of which offset the buyout of his shares. Settled the case settled for $5,000 in favor of the brokerage, with an order barring the former president from use of the stolen trade secrets.
  • Insurance Consumer Class Action: Successfully defended a national insurance brokerage against a class action alleging that the recording of customer telephone calls without proper disclosures was a violation of California statutes. At that time, California courts were interpreting this type of conduct as illegal and holding to the statutory damages of $5,000 per call. In this situation, there were approximately 600,000 such calls and the plaintiffs’ alleged $3B in statutory damages. Constructed a defense predicated on legislative intent dating back to 1967, arguing that the statutes at issue were designed to protect against “industrial espionage” and not improved customer service. After intense argument, the court agreed with the defense and dismissed the case in client's favor.
  • Insurance Employment Class Action: A prominent insurance brokerage was held liable for violating California’s wage and hour overtime laws, among related issues. Facing a $42M judgment, the client retained M&R. Conducting an in-depth analysis and designed a defense around the argument that the $42M judgment should be reduced to $1.2M because of a conflict in federal and state employment laws that were being misapplied by the plaintiffs’ lawyers. Specifically, the plaintiffs contended that pursuant to California’s Business & Professions Code §17200 (Unfair Competition Laws), it could expand the “class” under federal law. Countered by arguing that the United States Congress changed the law in the 1930s, and again in 1949, to prohibit the expansion of federal law as being applied in this case. After intense litigation regarding the legislative intent, the federal court agreed, limiting the judgment to $1.2M. The Ninth Circuit upheld the ruling on appeal.
  • Mishandled Fund Wiring: Successfully defended Western Union against mishandled fund wiring claims that allegedly resulted in foreclosure of the plaintiff’s home. Litigated through trial, with judgment entered in favor of Western Union after allegations were proven false.
  • Private Equity Fund Governmental Investigation: A high profile private equity firm was being investigated by various agencies, including the SEC, the Department of Justice, and multiple offices of the Attorney General, which sought to fine the fund over $30M. A large and well-known national law firm was unable to resolve the investigations, so the client retained M&R. After years of litigation in eight different jurisdictions, against numerous agencies, resolved the case with “closing letters” received from certain agencies, stating that the investigation was over. Later obtained a $9M investigation reimbursement for the client from a third party.
  • Product Defect: Obtained a substantial settlement for client against a national distributor of concrete and cement for alleged defects in its product's quality, resulting in mass damages associated with the architectural and ornate elements fabricated and installed at the client’s large hotels, mansions, casinos, and other properties in Nevada and other states. Brought the case to trial, and after direct and cross examinations, defendants agreed to reimburse client for all damages.
  • Wage and Hour Dispute: Defended an insurance brokerage firm against a $15M wage and hour class action in which former employees alleged unpaid wages for overtime. Successfully resolved the case favorably for client and obtained a $2M settlement, paid entirely by a third party.

Credentials

Bar & Court Admissions
  • California
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • U.S. District Court for the Central, Eastern and Southern Districts of California
Professional Affiliations
  • American Bar Association
  • State Bar of California
  • Los Angeles County Bar Association
  • California Bar Association
  • San Fernando County Bar Association
Community Involvement
  • USA Gymnastics
Education
  • Whittier Law School, J.D.
  • University of California, San Diego, B.A.
Recognition
  • Southern California Super Lawyers, Super Lawyers Magazine (2015-2021,2024)
  • 50 “Very Best Litigators” in L.A., Los Angeles Business Journal (2018)
  • Southern California Rising Star, Super Lawyers Magazine (2009)
  • Southern California Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers Magazine (2015-2025)

Marc R. Jacobs

Partner
Los Angeles
+1 310-299-5500
mjacobs@mrllp.com
“I lead complex cases with a singular focus—protecting the enterprise. That means managing teams, setting strategy, and seeing around corners to anticipate challenges before they surface.”
Overview

Marc Jacobs brings nearly 30 years of litigation experience to bear in disputes that carry real business, financial, and reputational consequences. Known for his strategic thinking and courtroom instincts, he represents clients in litigation where the exposure is measured not just in dollars, but in brand and operational risk.

His practice spans financial services, insurance, employment, real estate, and regulatory matters. Marc represents banks, insurers, marketing companies, and property developers in cases involving trade secrets, unfair competition, consumer privacy, and class actions. From deceptive advertising claims to Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) suits, he is known for litigation strategies that protect the bottom line.

Marc also advises marketing and technology companies on compliance and risk tied to digital campaigns, user data, and fast-moving regulatory standards. His clients count on him not just to defend lawsuits, but to anticipate and avoid them when possible.

Beyond the courtroom, Marc has supported elite gymnastics organizations in the U.S. and U.K., advising on matters of privacy, governance, and risk. A creative at heart, he is also a published novelist and legal cartoonist whose work has appeared in publications nationwide.

Practice Area

Advertising & Digital Media

Insurance

Technology

Class Action & Complex Litigation

Commercial & Business Litigation

Regulatory & Administrative Law

Representative Matters

  • Breach of Contract, Bad Faith: Successfully defended insurance carrier sued for allegedly failing to cover damages in a construction defect lawsuit. After a three-week trial, the insurer was found not to be liable for breach of contract or bad faith, which claims created potential exposure over $17M. The trial court's ruling was later affirmed by the California Court of Appeals
  • Brokerage Trade Secrets Litigation: Obtained a favorable outcome for an insurance broker who owned his brokerage for 25 years and sued a former employee that left the company and took the broker's customers. Litigated through a five-week trial, proving misappropriation and conversion of client lists and trade secrets.
  • Counseling: Assisted numerous gymnastics, sports, and athletic clubs and organizations, from youth sports through college, with business and entity formation; permits; privacy, social media, and intellectual property rights; labor and employment issues; and business litigation and contract matters.
  • Easement/Adverse Possession: Filed a successful motion for summary judgment on behalf of client in connection with a complex real property and easement dispute in Bel Air, California. The successful outcome forced an encroaching land owner to remove a portion of his property that had been in place for 45 years. The favorable judgment was subsequently affirmed by the California Court of Appeals.
  • Employment, Trade Secrets, and Business Litigation: When the former regional president of a national insurance brokerage left the company, he took with him trade secrets, client lists and customers. Upon his departure, the ex-employee was allegedly entitled to a multi-million dollar buyout of his company shares. Filed a lawsuit against the former president on behalf of the brokerage for breach of contract and theft of trade secrets, asserting claims the value of which offset the buyout of his shares. Settled the case settled for $5,000 in favor of the brokerage, with an order barring the former president from use of the stolen trade secrets.
  • Insurance Consumer Class Action: Successfully defended a national insurance brokerage against a class action alleging that the recording of customer telephone calls without proper disclosures was a violation of California statutes. At that time, California courts were interpreting this type of conduct as illegal and holding to the statutory damages of $5,000 per call. In this situation, there were approximately 600,000 such calls and the plaintiffs’ alleged $3B in statutory damages. Constructed a defense predicated on legislative intent dating back to 1967, arguing that the statutes at issue were designed to protect against “industrial espionage” and not improved customer service. After intense argument, the court agreed with the defense and dismissed the case in client's favor.
  • Insurance Employment Class Action: A prominent insurance brokerage was held liable for violating California’s wage and hour overtime laws, among related issues. Facing a $42M judgment, the client retained M&R. Conducting an in-depth analysis and designed a defense around the argument that the $42M judgment should be reduced to $1.2M because of a conflict in federal and state employment laws that were being misapplied by the plaintiffs’ lawyers. Specifically, the plaintiffs contended that pursuant to California’s Business & Professions Code §17200 (Unfair Competition Laws), it could expand the “class” under federal law. Countered by arguing that the United States Congress changed the law in the 1930s, and again in 1949, to prohibit the expansion of federal law as being applied in this case. After intense litigation regarding the legislative intent, the federal court agreed, limiting the judgment to $1.2M. The Ninth Circuit upheld the ruling on appeal.
  • Mishandled Fund Wiring: Successfully defended Western Union against mishandled fund wiring claims that allegedly resulted in foreclosure of the plaintiff’s home. Litigated through trial, with judgment entered in favor of Western Union after allegations were proven false.
  • Private Equity Fund Governmental Investigation: A high profile private equity firm was being investigated by various agencies, including the SEC, the Department of Justice, and multiple offices of the Attorney General, which sought to fine the fund over $30M. A large and well-known national law firm was unable to resolve the investigations, so the client retained M&R. After years of litigation in eight different jurisdictions, against numerous agencies, resolved the case with “closing letters” received from certain agencies, stating that the investigation was over. Later obtained a $9M investigation reimbursement for the client from a third party.
  • Product Defect: Obtained a substantial settlement for client against a national distributor of concrete and cement for alleged defects in its product's quality, resulting in mass damages associated with the architectural and ornate elements fabricated and installed at the client’s large hotels, mansions, casinos, and other properties in Nevada and other states. Brought the case to trial, and after direct and cross examinations, defendants agreed to reimburse client for all damages.
  • Wage and Hour Dispute: Defended an insurance brokerage firm against a $15M wage and hour class action in which former employees alleged unpaid wages for overtime. Successfully resolved the case favorably for client and obtained a $2M settlement, paid entirely by a third party.

Credentials

Bar & Court Admissions
  • California
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • U.S. District Court for the Central, Eastern and Southern Districts of California
Professional Affiliations
  • American Bar Association
  • State Bar of California
  • Los Angeles County Bar Association
  • California Bar Association
  • San Fernando County Bar Association
Community Involvement
  • USA Gymnastics
Education
  • Whittier Law School, J.D.
  • University of California, San Diego, B.A.
Recognition
  • Southern California Super Lawyers, Super Lawyers Magazine (2015-2021,2024)
  • 50 “Very Best Litigators” in L.A., Los Angeles Business Journal (2018)
  • Southern California Rising Star, Super Lawyers Magazine (2009)
  • Southern California Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers Magazine (2015-2025)

Stay Up To Date

News, insights, and what's ahead, all from Michelman Robinson

© 2025 Michelman & Robinson, LLP